Words starting with i

Slang words, phrases and definitions

Meaning of IN THE SOUP

IN THE SOUP means: In the soup is slang for in trouble.

Meaning of IN THE TRAP

IN THE TRAP means: In the trap is British slang for ready and waiting to go.

Meaning of IN YOUR EYE

IN YOUR EYE means: In your eye is a slang expression of violent enial, refusal, dismissal.

Meaning of IN−AND−OUT MAN

IN−AND−OUT MAN means: In−and−out man is British slang for an opportunist thief.

Meaning of IN−OUT

IN−OUT means: In−out is slang for sexual intercourse.

Meaning of INDEX

INDEX means: Index is Black−American slang for the human face

Meaning of INDIA

INDIA means: India is British slang for marijuana, cannabis.

Meaning of INDIAN CHARM

INDIAN CHARM means: Indian charm is London Cockney rhyming slang for arm.

Meaning of INDIAN HEMP

INDIAN HEMP means: Indian hemp is slang for marijuana, cannabis, hashish.

Meaning of INDICA

INDICA means: Indica is slang for cannabis.

Slang words, phrases and definitions

Meaning of SEC v. Crowd Machine Inc. et al: Complaint

SEC v. Crowd Machine Inc. et al: Complaint means: Complaint alleging a “fraudulent and unregistered” cryptocurrency offering that “raised more than $33 million from hundreds of investors” and involved entities in Australia, Cayman Islands, South Africa, and United States in U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Crowd Machine Inc., of Delaware; Metavine Inc., of Delaware, and Craig Derel Sproule, a citizen of Australia, as Defendants, and Metavine Pty. Ltd., of Australia, as Relief Defendant, at the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of California. https://www.offshorealert.com/sec-v-crowd-machine-inc-et-al-complaint/

Meaning of USA v. Satish Kumbhani: Criminal Indictment

USA v. Satish Kumbhani: Criminal Indictment means: Criminal Indictment alleging a $2.4 billion investment fraud and money laundering scheme involving BitConnect, which “operated a cryptocurrency investment platform and touted its various investment programs through social media”, in USA v. Satish Kurjibhai Kumbhani, described as a citizen of India, at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of California. Visit : https://www.offshorealert.com/usa-v-satish-kumbhani-criminal-indictment/

Meaning of SEC v. Fernando Passos: Complaint

SEC v. Fernando Passos: Complaint means: Complaint “against Passos, a former senior executive at Brazilian reinsurance company IRB Brasil Resseguros S.A., for planting a false story with the media and disseminating false documents claiming that Berkshire Hathaway Inc. had recently made a substantial investment in IRB” in U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Fernando Passos, described as a resident of São Paulo, Brazil, at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. https://www.offshorealert.com/sec-v-fernando-passos-complaint/

Meaning of SEC v. John Barksdale et al: Complaint (‘$124M Crypto-Based Fraud’)

SEC v. John Barksdale et al: Complaint (‘$124M Crypto-Based Fraud’) means: Complaint alleging the defendants “raised at least $124 million from over 20,000 investors” in a crypto-based fraudulent scheme involving Ormeus Global SA, of Panama, and Ormeus Coin, of Hong Kong, in U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. John Barksdale, described as a citizen of the USA residing in Thailand, and his sister, JonAtina Barksdale, a.k.a. Tina Barksdale, described as a citizen of the USA residing in Hong Kong, at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. https://www.offshorealert.com/sec-v-john-barksdale-et-al-complaint-124m-fraud/

Meaning of SEC v. Moshe Strugano et al: Complaint

SEC v. Moshe Strugano et al: Complaint means: Complaint alleging insider trading in the shares of U.S. Geothermal, Inc. prior to a public announcement regarding its acquisition by Ormat Technologies, Inc., described as a “Switzerland-based financial institution”, in U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Moshe Strugano and Rinat Gazit, both described as citizens and residents of Israel, at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. https://www.offshorealert.com/sec-v-moshe-strugano-et-al-complaint/

Meaning of Streeterville Capital LLC v. Molecular Data Inc.: Writ of Summons ($1.7M Claim)

Streeterville Capital LLC v. Molecular Data Inc.: Writ of Summons ($1.7M Claim) means: Writ of Summons in Streeterville Capital LLC, of Utah, USA v. Molecular Data Inc. at the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. https://www.offshorealert.com/streeterville-capital-llc-v-molecular-data-inc-writ-of-summons-1-7m-claim/

Meaning of USA v. ‘All Bitcoin’ at LocalBitcoins Crypto Exchange Owned by Ka Tsz Yip

USA v. ‘All Bitcoin’ at LocalBitcoins Crypto Exchange Owned by Ka Tsz Yip means: Forfeiture Complaint for the alleged proceeds of narcotics trafficking in USA v. “All Bitcoin” owned by Ka Tsz Yip at LocalBitcoins, described as a cryptocurrency exchange in Finland, filed at the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. https://www.offshorealert.com/usa-v-all-bitcoin-at-localbitcoins-crypto-exchange-owned-by-ka-tsz-yip/

Meaning of USA v. Ilya Lichtenstein et al: Order Staying Release

USA v. Ilya Lichtenstein et al: Order Staying Release means: Order Staying Release of Defendants in USA v. Ilya Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan at the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia. https://www.offshorealert.com/usa-v-ilya-lichtenstein-et-al-order-staying-release/

Meaning of Ulises Fernandez Miro v. Binance Holdings Ltd. et al: Complaint (‘$488K Crypto Fraud’)

Ulises Fernandez Miro v. Binance Holdings Ltd. et al: Complaint (‘$488K Crypto Fraud’) means: Complaint alleging “a fraudulent scheme that sought to, and ultimately did, steal $488,000.00 worth of cryptocurrency from Plaintiff” in Ulises Fernandez Miro v. John Doe and Binance Holdings Ltd., of the Cayman Islands, at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. https://www.offshorealert.com/ulises-fernandez-miro-v-binance-holdings-ltd-et-al-complaint-488k-crypto-fraud/

Meaning of USA v. Ilya Lichtenstein et al: Criminal Complaint (‘$4.5B Stolen Crypto’)

USA v. Ilya Lichtenstein et al: Criminal Complaint (‘$4.5B Stolen Crypto’) means: Criminal Complaint alleging conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiring to defraud the United States involving Bitcoin currently “valued at over $4.5 billion” that was allegedly stolen in a 2016 hack of Bitfinex, a cryptocurrency exchange operated by a British Virgin Islands-domiciled firm in USA v. Ilya Lichtenstein, described as “a Russian-U.S. national residing in New York”, and his wife, Heather Rhiannon Morgan. https://www.offshorealert.com/usa-v-ilya-lichtenstein-et-al-criminal-complaint-4-5b-stolen-crypto/

Copyrights © 2016 LingoMash. All Rights Reserved.